HN Reader

If you're in the UK there is a parliament.uk petition to "Ban payment processors stopping services based on objections to legal content": https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/734441

If the payment processors really cared about children, they would be banning companies that sell guns, not video games with boobs in them.

Is this any different than the previous takes and discussions 2 months ago?

Against the censorship of adult content by payment processors

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44679406

Payment processors' bar on Japanese adult content endangers democracy

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44627828

Visa and Mastercard: The global payment duopoly

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44676559

Hot take, but Steam, a platform used by millions of children, should not have adult games.

Unless it's de facto illegal, payment processors should be business agnostic. You can make arguments that it's their platform, their business, they can do whatever they want - but that goes for insurance companies and everyone else we want to act neutrally.